When it comes to sheer resolving power, the bigger and pricier Rokinon 14mm f/2.4 SP (aka, the Rokinon 14mm f/2.4 SP) is a champion. Light drop off. … vs. Sigma 15mm F2.8 EX DG Diagonal Fisheye. Sigma 85mm f/1.4 DG DN Art vs. Samyang/Rokinon 85mm f/1.4 Sigma's new 85mm masterpiece made expressly for mirrorless digital cameras looks to be the new king of 85mm lens options for Sony full-frame e-mount. Not only is the optical quality excellent but it is also well-built, PDAF compatible and benefits from a very fast aperture. Site Update: End of 2018 + New Photographer! Focal Length - Wide: 24mm vs 30mm: 6mm wider coverage : Length: mm vs 59 mm: 59 mm shorter: Sigma 30mm F1.4 EX DC HSM vs Rokinon 24mm f1.4 Specs Table. Light drop off. At its price point, and obvious plastic construction, I didn’t exactly expect to be blown away once I got this lens in my hands. From an aesthetics standpoint, which I honestly care almost nothing about, the 14SP is a nice-looking lens and was clearly designed with Zeiss’s external look in mind. Lucky for you, I’ve owned the Sigma 30mm f/1.4 lens for over 3 years and the Sigma 16mm f/1.4 for over 2 … Following angle of view analysis, this section will be dedicated to assessing distortion. Interestingly, while the Sigma clearly has an advantage at f/2.8 (and f/1.4 to a lesser degree), the two lenses begin to deliver much more similar results once you stop down beyond f/4. I knew it would happen eventually. If you buy something after clicking the link, we will receive a small commission. Usually it takes on the appearance of a green orb. Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Sigma 16mm, 30mm, and 56mm f/1.4 DC DN Contemporary Lenses Bundle for Sony E with Lens Case and Double 64 Extreme Pro SD Cards (7 Items) $1,117.00: Get the deal: General info. Rokinon 8mm vs. 10mm vs. Sigma 8-16mm vs. Pentax 10-17mm Ultra-wide Showdown What's in the Box. Rokinon 16mm f/2 Lens Review for Astrophotography - posted in DSLR, Mirrorless & General-Purpose Digital Camera DSO Imaging: Here’s my in-depth review of the Rokinon 16mm f/2.0 ED AS UMC CS Lens for astrophotography. When that distance is pushed closer, however, the lens at least puts on a decent show with smooth out-of-focus areas. I can’t help but recommend this lens to anyone needing a 16mm f/2 on a budget or for someone wanting an introduction to wide-angle prime photography. Hey guys, I will be buying a Panasonic gh4 along with the new metabones speedboster xl with 0.64 reduction factor, so for the lenses i have two questions. There’s a lot of bulkiness to the Rokinon 16mm that lends it to take up a big chunk in one’s camera bag. As I should have expected following the strange infinity focus tests, sharpness peaks at close focus at f/8. Throw in the field curvature and one can quickly find themselves finagling settings often in an attempt to get sharp images. This makes sense though, as the Sony, which is classified as a pancake lens, has fewer optical elements and a slower maximum aperture of f/2.8. From an aesthetics standpoint, which I honestly care almost nothing about, the 14SP is a nice-looking lens and was clearly designed with Zeiss’s external look in mind. Dimensions: 3.27 inches/84 millimeters wide, 3.42 inches/86 millimeters long, with a moderate weight of 20 ounces/571 grams. Rokinon/Samyang 14mm vs 16mm - posted in DSLR, Mirrorless & General-Purpose Digital Camera DSO Imaging: Hi folks can I pick your brains. It’s time for a vacation in my neck of the woods, but you can bet I’ll take my camera with me for whatever I find along the way! With either 16mm lens, you can expect to come across some longitudinal chromatic aberration in backlit scenes or high contrast areas of the image at the fastest aperture values. I have a nikon D300 with cropped sensor at the moment and am quite happy with it! By. Before we get to the direct comparisons, however, there are two things we wanted to direct your attention to as you may have missed it while wading through the many scenes on the previous page. * In fact, one of the oldest primes for the system is the E 16mm f/2.8, an inexpensive pancake lens haunted by something of a mixed reputation. As a nice little surprise, out-of-focus highlights at f/2 and f/2.8 actually look pretty decent–the few times one may get to see them in photographs. The difference can be seen by looking at the two images below. Lens is available in nearly every mount out there: Canon EF-S, Nikon F, Sony E, Sony α, Fuji X, Samsung NX, Pentax K, Canon M, and m4/3. As mentioned before, however, it is unlikely one will even get corners this sharp out in the world due to field curvature. Thank you! The Rokinon 16mm doesn’t provide a very consistent performance as the focus distance changes. By f/2.8 the veiling haze is gone and a contrast bump helps perceived resolution greatly. Posted by 3 years ago. A primary reason to want this lens is because it has a 14mm focal length and the focal length largely determines the type of photography a (or any) lens is used for.The ultra-wide 114° angle of view presented by the 14mm focal length is both very useful and extremely fun to use. It also comes packed with a plethora of useful features that … Full Name: Rokinon 16mm f/2 ED AS UMC CS Dimensions: 3.27 inches/84 millimeters wide, 3.42 inches/86 millimeters long, with a moderate weight of 20 ounces/571 grams. Read our detailed comparison of the Samyang AF 18mm F2.8 FE vs Sigma 16mm F1.4 DC DN Sony E-mount to find out their strengths and weaknesses, and decide which one to choose. The second of the two zooms, this one-of-a-kind zoom came home with this report card: Pros + Very well built and attractive, minimalist design + Compact despite extremely wide 2x zoom range + Excellent center sharpness from wide open + Quick, accurate, and silent autofocus + Autofocus … In fact, it’s so sharp, its extreme corners actually look better than the absolutely massive (and even more expensive) Sigma 14mm f/1.8, even when the Sigma is stopped down … As is common with wide-angles, the Rokinon 16mm exhibits a bit of lateral chromatic aberration in the corners at f/2-2.8, but with the aforementioned field curvature, corners at this aperture will rarely be in focus to show this effect anyway. Smooth operation? Pros + Well built with tight tolerances + Very compact, including embedded lens hood + Handles and balances very well on any … ReddIt. Build quality is also really good, high quality plastics, metal camera mount and all … Price: $405 vs $479: Cheaper by $74: Focal Length - Wide: 20mm vs 24mm: 4mm wider coverage: Diaphragm Blades: 9 vs: better Bokeh: Autofocus: Yes vs None: … Have you ever wanted to get more of the scene in front of you in the frame than your current lens allows, especially if you don't have room to take a few steps back? A fast maximum aperture of f/2.0 is effective in low light shooting and provides shallow depth of field. With two aspherical lens elements and one extra-low dispersion … Looking at Samyang/rokinon 10mm f2.8, 12mm f2.8(fisheye), 16mm f2.0 and Tokina 11-16 f2.8 suggested by a friend that already does astro. The upcoming Laowa 15mm f/2 Zero-D looks great, though it is substantially more expensive, is E-mount only, and also covers a full-frame sensor. One impressive feature of the Rokinon 16mm is its close-focus ability. The Sigma does seem to produce a little more barrel distortion than the Sony, but the difference is subtle. Almost. Wideangle Prime | Sony FE. Within the article, there are affiliate links. Though the lens produces many reflections, they are always very small. We compare side-by-side the Sigma 35mm f/1.4 Art lens vs the Rokinon 35mm f/1.4 AF lens in this battle of the fast 35mm lenses. Yet, with the recently announced Sigma 16mm F1.4, I'm wondering if I should just wait and get that. Those reviews on YouTube were spot on. The former affects the straight out-of-camera JPGs while the latter influences the look of the RAW files. Nan Lian Garden Center16mm, ISO 100, f/5.6, 1/1250, 11 images stitched, Spirals of Incense16mm, ISO 100, f/5.6, 1/8, Lantern Bearers16mm, ISO 100, f/5.6, 1/125, Neon by the Beach16mm, ISO 100, f/4, 1/10, Under the Lanterns16mm, ISO 200, f/4, 1/5, Chi Lin Nunnery Entrance16mm, ISO 100, f/5.6, 1/1250, Pondside Garden16mm, ISO 100, f/5.6, 1/30, Starting Trails16mm, ISO 100, f/5.6, 3.2 seconds, Yamagata16mm, ISO 160, f/5.6, 1/500, in-camera panorama, Gunning for a Treat16mm, ISO 100, f/2, 1/800, Nakamise Street16mm, ISO 100, f/5.6, 1/50, Large-Format Part 216mm, ISO 100, f/5.6, 1/1000, 6 images stitched, Senjo-Ji Entrance16mm, ISO 100, f/5.6, 1/60, That’s all for this much-overdue review, guys and gals. After three years of shooting, let’s find out! Intercontinental Yokohama Grand16mm, ISO 100, f/5.6, 1/3200, Steaming Street Sculpture16mm, ISO 100, f/5.6, 1/1600. I would like to buy my first non-kit lens, and I think the Rokinon 12mm looks like a good option, particularly for astro/landscape. i want to do night-caps that include foreground and the Milky way. 2. Change ). So all you see with regard to its function suit my … We were not asked to write anything about these lenses, nor were we provided with any sort of compensation. Sony 16mm with UWC vs Rokinon/Samyang 12mm? That is, unless you are an astrophotographer. Sigma 35mm f/1.4 DG HSM ART Lens @ f/16. Sigma 35mm f/1.4 Art vs NEW Rokinon 35mm f/1.4 AF lens. In particular with this optic, the vignetting issues, slight distortion, field curvature, and lack of cross-frame resolution make multi-row panoramas all but impossible. Email. The tests above put the Rokinon 16mm about a foot away from my test chart (yes, it’s wide! I would like to buy my first non-kit lens, and I think the Rokinon 12mm looks like a good option, particularly for astro/landscape. Castle and Samurai Fun16mm, ISO 100, f/5.6, 1/1000. This makes sense though, as the Sony, which is classified as a pancake lens, has fewer optical elements and a slower maximum aperture of f/2.8. I believe that all these features combined make it worth the extra expense in comparison to the Sony lens. The imperfections of Sony E-mount lenses, such as distortion, are either corrected in-camera or via a profile applied in your post production software. This doesn’t … I have a Sigma EX 10-20mm f4-5.6 that I happily use for daytime ultrawide, but it is possible that this new lens would have use in that scenario in lowlight also. share. Closest Competition: As of this writing, none. The Sigma’s ring is much more precise, not to mention that the rubber ribbing and extra thickness make it easier to grab and twist. Overlook16mm, ISO 100, f/5.6, 1/4000High-contrast scenes pose no problem as long as you nail focus. Thanks! ( Log Out / Rokinon 14mm F2.8 IF ED MC Tokina AT-X Pro 11-16mm f/2.8 DX Tokina AT-X Pro 11-16mm f/2.8 DX II. Here’s a 10-minute video from Nature TTL that looks at the best lens for star photography. amzn_assoc_title = ""; There are few wide-angle primes out there for APS-c cameras, especially those with fast apertures. To start, here is how we assessed the Pentax 10-17mm Fisheye. Samyang AF 18mm F2.8 FE vs Sigma 16mm F1.4 DC DN Sony E-mount. For the $270 I spent on it, it has been an invaluable tool for multiple events (both paid and volunteer), in-the-moment low-light shots, and general travel photographs that didn’t necessarily need to be perfect at the pixel level. I found both lenses to be quick in good light, with only a slight deterioration in performance in low light conditions. It … First, here are … Bought 2 Sigma lenses (this one and 30mm) because of YouTube reviews. Wide open, all the lenses, even the Sigma and Rokinon … Your personal data won't be recorded until the form has been submitted successfully. The Sigma isn’t the first 16mm lens for Sony APS-C however. Rokinon 16M-C 16mm f/2.0 Aspherical Wide Angle Lens for Canon EF Cameras Number Of Items 1 Has Image Stabilization No Min Aperture 22 Min Focal Length 16 Millimeters Batteries Included No Batteries Required No Material Metal barrel, metal mount Form Factor SLR Lens Type Wide Angle Mounting Type Canon EF, Samsung NX, Sony A, Sony E, Includes Rechargable Battery No … Some corner shading at the fastest apertures is inevitable with fast-aperture wide-angle lenses and such is the case of the Sigma and Sony 16mm. Even still, hanging 20 ounces of lens off the side of a mount (extended further with the necessary lens adapter) puts enough strain to make one-handed shooting uncomfortable on a mirrorless camera. With the same optical formula as in their 16mm f/2.0 AS UMC CS Lens, the 16mm T2.2 is a fast, full-manual-control … Just because a lens is made specifically for an APS-C body does not mean that its focal length is measured differently, somehow accounting for the smaller image circle utilized by the smaller imaging sensor.A 1.5x or 1.6x multiplier (FOVCF) must be used to determine the full frame angle of view equivalent that many of us think in.Multip… Unabashedly a “plastic-fantastic” lens, does the Rokinon 16mm f/2 hold up on the a6500? Bouquet16mm, ISO 100, f/2, 1/80As with any fast lens, corner sharpness doesn’t mean much when the corners aren’t going to be in focus anyway. 15mm Laowa vs. Rokinon 14mm SP vs. Sigma Art 14mm – Comparing the left side of the image for vignetting (light fall-off), wide open and stopped down. A fast maximum aperture of f/2.0 is effective in low light shooting and provides shallow depth of field. The differences are most striking at the fastest values (f/1.4 and f/2.8). 100% Upvoted. The lens continues Rokinon’s trend of adapting their DLSR lenses to a more video-friendly housing. First one is whether to go with the Rokinon 24mm and 35mm cine lenses OR the sigma 18/35 mm f/1.8 ? Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. Dial it back to f/2.8-4 and subjects really “pop” with decent sharpness to boot. We compare side-by-side the Sigma 35mm f/1.4 Art lens vs the Rokinon 35mm f/1.4 AF lens in this battle of the fast 35mm lenses. Print. That being said, because the Sony 16mm is one of the only E-mount lenses that isn’t compatible with Sony’s PDAF (phase detection autofocus) system, you may find that focusing is slower than with the Sigma, particularly when shooting moving subjects. The 16mm f/2.0 ED AS UMC CS Lens from Rokinon is a manual focus wide-angle lens compatible with APS-C format DSLR digital cameras. On the a6500, the lens is surprisingly balanced for its size, owing mostly to the generous use of plastic in its construction. E-mount wide-angle comparison of the Sigma 16mm f1.4 and Sony 10-18mm f4 as well as other competitors. amzn_assoc_tracking_id = "mlscomp-nsa-20"; Detailed … … Generally favorable optical performance? The Sony APS-C range has faced some neglect as of late due to much of Sony’s focus being funnelled into lens development for the extremely popular full-frame FE system. Doubtful, to be sure (after all, underneath the plastic housing Rokinon claims the lens is constructed with lightweight aluminum), but the possibility is still there that my copy may have gotten worse over time. Cove Sunset16mm, ISO 100, f/5.6, 1/3200, 15 images stitchedThis shot took a lot of editing to correct as a multi-row panorama, Engetsukyo Moon Bridge16mm, ISO 100, f/5.6, 1/400, 10 images stitchedMeanwhile, this single-row panorama only required a touch of perspective correction. As always, stopping the lens down can greatly reduce chromatic aberration of this kind. Both cost in the region of $600 US, making them more affordable than the Zeiss Batis 85mm f/1.8 (which currently retails for around $900 US) and the expensive Sony FE 85mm f/1.4 GM. I don’t often make sweeping statements about sharpness, as the differences between lenses are often quite subtle, but in the case of these two primes, I can say beyond the shadow of a doubt that the Sigma is much sharper and has better contrast at all aperture values up to f/4. The Rokinon 16mm is no exception, especially being an APS-c lens. Rokinon has just released a 16mm T2.2 wide-angle cine lens designed for APS-C and Micro Four Thirds cameras. This is the moment you've been waiting for, the full in depth review of the Sigma 16mm 1.4, i've tackled all aspects of this lens. Rokinon 14mm f/2.8 vs. Tokina 11-16 f/2.8 Jan 28, 2018 Or something else entirely. Click below for full-size crops. we’ll see. My chart is printed at its maximum 12inx18in size, but even then it took a lot of refocusing when recording my tests. That said, even without testing the lenses side-by-side, we know that the Sigma should deliver more eye-catching results because its maximum aperture is two stops faster. It can be reversed over the barrel but can be a little difficult to twist off at times. vs. ... Sigma 15mm F2.8 EX DG Diagonal Fisheye. The industry standard geared focus and iris rings share a common position with other Cine DS … ( Log Out / Would I like better performance in general? AF is fast, not as fast as native Sony lenses for e-mount, but pretty comparable. 1. weather-sealed (splashproof) Samyang 35mm f/1.4 AS UMC. Rokinon 8mm vs. 10mm vs. Sigma 8-16mm vs. Pentax 10-17mm Ultra-wide Showdown Sigma 8-16mm Rating. Small size? Neither is classified as weather-sealed but the Sigma benefits from a brass bayonet mount that is surrounded by a special sealing to keep dust and moisture out. Victoria Peak Overlook16mm, f/4, ISO 100, 1/1600. In these 100% crops of a dead branch against a 2-stop overexposed sky (worst-case scenario for purple fringing), there is a slight tinge of purple at f/2, about 1 pixel wide. As a fast lens at a low price, I expected the Rokinon 16mm to have issues with chromatic aberrations at wide apertures. Last updated: June 14, 2018 Go to Comments. Between the two, the Sigma seems to suffer more but this is to be expected from fast lenses. The difference in rendering becomes even more clear in the following outdoor examples taken on the Aberdyfi pier, where the bokeh of the Sony 16mm is more confusing and less smooth. An sigma 16 is 419$ Get two lenses that are still cheaper or get one lens ? At just under .66 feet/.2 meters, you can get really close to subjects for some interesting shots. As such, in the few instances where you can create some separation with this lens, the out-of-focus areas tend to look just fine, especially for a wide-angle lens. I'm more of a vacation/amateur photographer, so i'd only like to make the wide angle lens purchase once. The Rokinon 14mm f/2.8 and the Rokinon 14mm f/2.4SP. To put it simply, I got the Rokinon 16mm three years ago to learn how to work within the field of view of a real wide-angle lens. The Sigma is currently only available in black whereas the Sony lens comes in black or silver. Close foregrounds are nice and smooth at all apertures, while backgrounds at f/2.8 fade away very well. Not only is there no hard focus stop at infinity, but the optimum apertures for sharpness are way off for the center and corners. The Rokinon is good but it just is bad wide open, that's not ideal for astro. Before we get to the detailed list of specifications, one way in which they differ is the naming conventions and various acronyms that make up their official lens names. vs. Rokinon MF 14mm f/2.8 Z. vs. Sigma 10mm F2.8 EX DC HSM Fisheye. Change ), You are commenting using your Google account. 63 mm vs 77 mm: 14 mm smaller in diameter: Reasons to choose Sigma 30mm F1.4 EX DC HSM over Rokinon 35mm f1.4. Let’s see if this is actually the case! In fact, it’s so sharp, its extreme corners actually look better than the absolutely massive (and even more expensive) Sigma 14mm f/1.8, even when the Sigma is stopped down to f/2.8. In addition, there is very little loss of contrast through veiling flare. We were not asked to write anything about these lenses, nor were we provided with any sort of compensation. Looking at the examples below, we can see that the Sigma does indeed produce a smoother, more pleasant background blur than the Sony, especially when used wide open. To know more about our ethics, you can visit our full disclosure page. Even at f/2.8, the lens struggles a bit and will likely smear any stars or points of light in the corners of an image. Sony E 35mm f/1.8 vs Sigma 30mm f/2.8 vs Sigma 30mm f/1.4, desire a fast-aperture wide-angle prime for close-up work, don’t mind the size of the lens (it fits the a6300/a6500 well but would overwhelm a smaller camera), don’t have a lot of money to spend on lenses at the moment, want a 24mm equivalent lens that is extremely compact and lightweight, mostly plan on shooting landscapes, cityscapes or street at f/5.6 or f/8. On this page and the three that follow it, we will provide our rating and final analysis for each lens. Designed to overcome the challenges in assembling a set of lenses over time, the Rokinon 16mm T2.6 Full-Frame Cine DS Lens for Nikon F Mount features a multilayer coating process for consistently-rendered color from lens to lens. When it comes down to the Sigma 16mm vs 30mm, both of these lenses are two of the best quality and best value prime lenses for the Sony a6500. Lens to replace . Lens is available in nearly every mount out there: Canon EF-S… This is why the announcement of the Sigma 16mm f/1.4, with its 24mm equivalent field of view and fast maximum aperture, was such breath of fresh air for E-mount users. F/5.6 gives the sharpest results, which actually turns out to be decently sharp, with good contrast to boot. If size and weight are important to you, one of the first differences you’ll certainly notice is just how much smaller and lighter the Sony lens is in comparison to the Sigma. Unfortunately, as an APS-c lens, the corners share a different story: Finding a sharp focus point at f/2-2.8 is next to impossible with this lens thanks to high vignetting, increased veiling haze, and and even higher inability to properly focus all the wavelengths of light together. It provides a 79.5° angle of view which translates into a 35mm format equivalency of 25.6mm. Sigma 16mm f/1.4 DC DN (Sony E-mount) The device is protected with extra seals to prevent failures caused by dust, raindrops, and water splashes. Designed to overcome the challenges in assembling a set of lenses over time, the Rokinon 16mm T2.6 Full-Frame Cine DS Lens for Nikon F Mount features a multilayer coating process for consistently-rendered color from lens to lens. On the flip side, unlike a slower wide-angle prime (like Voigtlaender’s compact optics), the lens with its huge focus ring actually sits pretty well in the hand! Sigma 35mm f/1.4 DG HSM ART Lens @ f/16. My August website update will be a few days late due to this. Facebook. Rokinon 8mm vs. 10mm vs. Sigma 8-16mm vs. Pentax 10-17mm Ultra-wide Showdown Distortions. 899. This is why the announcement of the Sigma 16mm f/1.4, with its 24mm equivalent field of view and fast maximum aperture, was such breath of fresh air for E-mount users. Introduced in 2017 are two fast ultra-wide 14mm lenses, from Sigma… Sony 10-18 f4 vs rokinon 12 f2/ sigma 16 f1.4. The 16mm is asp-c sensor only and thats me I have a canon 750D. As for manual focusing, I find the experience more frustrating with the Sony lens, not only because the fly-by-wire focus ring is so much stiffer than that of the Sigma but also because it is very difficult to judge the focus, even with magnification activated on the screen. New comments cannot be posted … The Sony lens may not come bundled with a hood but according to Imaging Resource, the hood for the 18-55mm lens is compatible. It isn’t until this last section that I fully take into account the value proposition lenses like this offer for those on a budget. The Sigma isn’t the first 16mm lens for Sony APS-C however. So that usage is of secondary concern, but for that I would prefer the extra wide FOV of the 14mm over the 16mm. im wondering, does it compare at all to the Rokinon 12mm? 4. Well it’s safe to say that this lens is huge, much bigger than the Sigma 30mm 1.4 and so much bigger than the 16mm sony pancake or even the kit lens. Finally we come to sharpness at a close focusing distance. 83 mm vs 89 mm: 6 mm smaller in diameter: Length: mm vs 90 mm: 90 mm shorter: Filter Thread: 77 mm vs 82 mm: Smaller filters are cheaper: Reasons to choose Sigma 20mm F1.8 EX DG Aspherical RF over Rokinon 24mm f1.4 Aspherical. Returning to the scene we used for the field of view comparison, we can see that the Sony lens produces a slightly cooler rendering than the Sigma. ... Samyang/Rokinon has announced the brand new lens for 8k video. I find myself using 16mm wide angle most of the time. Samyang AF 18mm F2.8 FE. Below is a 100% crop of the same building used in last review’s infinity focus test. Sigma 35mm f/1.4 DG HSM ART Lens @ f/11. Rokinon 8mm vs. 10mm vs. Sigma 8-16mm vs. Pentax 10-17mm Ultra-wide Showdown Pentax 10-17mm FE Rating. Close. Samyang/Rokinon 12mm F2.0 or Sigma 16mm F1.4 ? Ethics statement: We were provided with a sample of the Sigma 16mm and bought the Sony 16mm for our personal use. As such, I can gladly say this is one travel lens that can safely easily be used, but hardly abused. The Rokinon 16mm is designed to be a budget-friendly, decent performing lens. The industry standard geared focus and iris rings share a common position with other Cine DS lenses, eliminating the time it would take to reposition a matte box, follow … Rokinon 8mm vs. 10mm vs. Sigma 8-16mm vs. Pentax 10-17mm Ultra-wide Showdown Specifications. Wideangle Prime | Sony E. BUY from B&H PHOTO. Also, since the Sigma 16mm f/1.4 is at a more extreme wide-angle, you will get some lens distortion, while the 30mm focal length gives a more natural look. ), so it stands to reason that the infinity performance may differ. After attempting many, many panoramas with this lens, I recommend staying away from the Rokinon 16mm as a panorama tool. Although they are very similar in build, aperture, look, and feel, they both excel in different aspects of photography and videography. Below you can see a couple of the worst examples I encountered during my testing period. Reasons to choose Samyang AF 18mm F2.8 FE over Sigma 16mm F1.4 DC DN Sony E-mount. Change ), You are commenting using your Twitter account. It has a very small rubber gasket near the lens mount and Sigma calls it “dust and splash-proof”, which suggests some further sealing internally. Above, I compare the vignetting of the three lenses, both wide open and when stopped down. Because great photographs don't make themselves. I did, however, have decent hopes for its optical performance out in the field. amzn_assoc_search_bar = "false"; Up until recently, the Sony 16mm f/2.8 pancake lens was the only option Sony E-mount users had if they wanted a 24mm equivalent prime (35mm format) with autofocus. Diffraction comes back again here by f/22. It provides a 79.5° angle of view which translates into a 35mm format equivalency of 25.6mm. I know others are available but suffice to say 6 months of trawling have led here. Google+. This issue most noticeably manifests itself in panoramas, discussed further on in the review. Although the Sigma is visibly larger, it is also worth pointing out that it is very lightweight for this type of lens. However, the Sigma has a higher magnification (0.10x versus 0.078x). Anyway, beyond that I’m looking forward to taking delivery of that Laowa 15mm f/2 in September! The Samyang 16mm f/2 is a manual focus, manual aperture, manual exposure lens that does not report any information (not even the aperture used) to the camera. For example, if you shoot a model from low to high with the Sigma 16mm, the feet of the model will look much larger than the hands of the model. The main difference between them, of … By f/11, diffraction starts to affect the sharpness of both lenses. ... vs. Fujifilm XF 8-16mm f/2.8 R LM WR. Both lenses incorporate an internal focus unit, which is driven by an internal stepping motor on the Sigma and a generic AF motor on the Sony. … I have taken two photos (four in total) so that the … Price from sony 10-18 is 899$ Price for rokinon 12 is 299. Unless the chart is poster-sized, the lens will be so close that when the center is in focus, the corners are out of the center’s depth-of-field. My advice though? Detail seems to peak between f/4-5.6, and diffraction sets in noticeably at f/16–great news for those wanting to squeeze as much depth-of-field as possible for complex landscape shots. By f/4 the aperture starts creating a hard ring around the outside of the highlight and at f/5.6 some annoying artifacts rear their head within most highlights. Single row panoramas actually tend to turn out just fine with careful shooting technique. Because the Sigma 16mm and Sony 16mm are wide-angle lenses, it isn’t particularly easy to achieve a pleasant shallow depth of field unless you focus close to your subject and use the fastest apertures available. More precisely, the two lenses that I am going to compare are the Irix 15mm f/2.4 Blackstone and the Rokinon (Samyang) ... Focal Length: 14mm vs 15mm A photographer in a forum once told me that 1 mm in this focal length is a lot and that it is not the same having a 14mm as a 15mm focal length. Stop the Sigma down to match the f/2.8 aperture and we find that despite having a similar size, the bokeh balls of the Sigma – in addition to featuring fewer “onion rings” – assume the symmetrical shape of the 9-blade aperture. Diaphragm Blades: 9 vs: better Bokeh: Autofocus: Yes vs None: Easier and more accurate focusing: Length: 94 mm vs 112 mm: 18 mm shorter: Filter Thread: 67 mm vs 77 mm: Smaller filters are cheaper: Rokinon 35mm f1.4 vs Sigma 35mm F1.4 DG HSM Specs Table. Flare and ghosting can occur with either lens, especially when shooting in the direction of bright light sources, but I didn’t find it overly invasive. However, there are likely better options out there for architectural shots that don’t require as much editing. All in all, centers show no serious issues. A small disclaimer, to be sure: I have shot with the Rokinon 16mm for close to three years now, and it is possible that the bumps and scrapes suffered from multiple outings could have affected the lens’ optical formula a little bit. Oddly, the corners don’t reach peak sharpness until f/8, and even then it isn’t terribly sharp. As always, have a great day. Sigma 35mm f/1.4 DG HSM ART Lens @ f/11. With the Sigma, by comparison, the speed at which you turn the ring affects how quickly you go from one extreme to the other. Reply to thread Reply with quote Complain. Rokinon 16mm F2.0 High Speed Wide angle The 16mm f/2.0 ED AS UMC CS Lens from Rokinon is a manual focus wide-angle lens compatible with APS-C format DSLR digital cameras. As always, if you are unfamiliar with my lens review style, check this post first! Since we had both … save hide report. It doesn’t make it any better that even besides this, the Rokinon 16mm suffers from some mild field curvature. Will help with noise and exposure times compared to the Rokinon. The process of testing a wide-angle lens’ sharpness can be pretty finicky, especially when shooting a resolution chart. This same lens is also currently sold under the Samyang and Bower brand names. The truth is that the difference exists. amzn_assoc_region = "US"; * In fact, one of the oldest primes for the system is the E 16mm f/2.8, an inexpensive pancake lens haunted by something of a mixed reputation. Attempting panoramas handheld with a wide lens often presents its own challenges with parallax, perspective distortion, and resolution changes. Looking at Samyang/rokinon 10mm f2.8, 12mm f2.8(fisheye), 16mm f2.0 and Tokina 11-16 f2.8 suggested by a friend that already does astro. . Detailed comparison of specifications. Another couple inches of length are added with the hood, but only about an ounce or so of weight. Yes! (In Lightroom, you can do this by going to the Lens Corrections tab on the right.). Overall I find the rendering of the Sigma more true-to-life than that of the Sony. If you have an Sony a6500 with IBIS, then get the Sigma 16mm 1.4 and 30mm 1.4 - … Although it does have some advantages, such as an extremely compact construction and a very affordable price point, I admit that everything else about the lens feels outdated, from the optical quality to its AF motor, which isn’t compatible with Sony’s latest PDAF system. Unfortunately the vignetting on this lens never really goes away, and it can be very difficult to correct in Lightroom. For practical purposes, and for the most even cross-frame sharpness, shoot at f/5.6. Although it sports an 8-bladed aperture, the Rokinon 16mm produces generally circular bokeh highlights out to f/4. Twitter. Thanks in large part to the focal length, foregrounds and backgrounds near the focus point do not exhibit enough blur to really judge their bokeh character. What would you would say would better, either two prime lens or one zoom lens ? The front element is also larger, which probably accounts for the extra 200 … More to come on that unique lens soon. Similar to the test charts, the center sharpens up the most at f/4, with f/5.6 only slightly behind. Change Sigma 16mm F1.4 DC DN Sony E-mount. Re: Sony A6000 - Samyang 12mm 2.0 vs Sigma 16mm 1.4 In reply to Super_T • Apr 4, 2018 The infinity on mine is exactly at the vertical line of the "L" mark vs. Samyang 14mm F/2.8 ED AS IF UMC. Thanks for dropping by! For its price, there really isn’t much to complain about. Throw in the field curvature and one can quickly find themselves finagling settings often in an attempt to get sharp images. Read our detailed comparison of the Rokinon 35mm f1.4 vs Sigma 30mm F1.4 EX DC HSM to find out their strengths and weaknesses, and decide which one to choose. The lens is fantastic. Photographing architecture is a popular use for a 14mm lens.Building… amzn_assoc_ad_mode = "manual"; According to the official specifications, the two lenses have a similar minimum focus distance (25cm for the Sigma / 24cm for the Sony). The Sigma is constructed from a mix of plastic, metallic parts, and TSC (Thermally Stable Composite), a material that expands and contracts less in extreme temperatures and offers more elasticity. Pinterest. Notice how bright the corners are at f/1.4 (first image) compared to f/1.7 (second image). find out if it's the lens for you or not. Note that the same picture profile (Standard) and white balance (5600K) was used for both images and the light conditions did not change between shots. x. Turning to the corners, we can see the Sony’s performance deteriorate even further, especially at the fastest apertures. Are you also aware that the Tokina has AF whereas the Rokinon is manual focus? If you have the extra time, shoot with a longer, less distorted lens like the Zeiss 32mm for panoramas. Looking more closely at the out-of-focus areas and bokeh quality, we can see that the bokeh balls produced by the Sigma between f/1.4 and f/2 are much larger and cleaner than those of the Sony at f/2.8. I've got an opportunity to buy the sony e mount 16mm lens for pretty cheap. The Rokinon 14mm f/2.8 and the Rokinon 14mm f/2.4SP. Surprisingly enough, the large focus ring is buttery smooth and its short focus throw makes quick focus acquisition a breeze. If you decide to manually correct it, a +6 correction should get you close enough to the lens profile. Regarding basic sharpness performance, though, shoot at f/5.6 to guarantee decent … Change. Also, most of it disappears in images taken with the Sigma by f/2.8 but with the Sony at this value, it can occur. Apply the appropriate profiles in a post-production software like Lightroom, however, and it almost completely disappears. What is the difference between Sigma 16mm f/1.4 DC DN (Sony E-mount) and Samyang 14mm F/2.8 ED AS IF UMC? Although I am a Technical Engineer and I am constantly explaining to my students how to do technical laboratory tests, I thought that if I was just to submerge readers in technical data, the various brands are there to do that, so I am going to carry out a real comparison between the Irix and the Rokinon (Samyang), or at least I am going to try to. Whereas the Sony peaks at around f/5.6 at the centre, the Sigma’s performance is almost identical from f/2 to f/5.6. The sigma is a great lens good quality and from what I have read is very close to the canon 15 2.8 but right now the 8-15L still takes the cake as best IQ and this rokinon is ridiculously close and a wee bit better in the corners. Change ), You are commenting using your Facebook account. An interesting fact about the Sony lens is that it is compatible with two optional converters: the VCL-ECU1 ultra-wide converter (B&H Photo) and VCL-ECF1 fisheye converter (B&H Photo). Etc. vs. Sigma … Comparing them side-by-side in the field reveals that the Sony is ever so slightly wider but the difference is barely worth mentioning. The 16mm DN is the first Sigma mirrorless lens to include some moisture resistance, which I think very important on a lens that will likely be used for landscape work. The Rokinon 16mm f/2 sports a rather large front element for a wide-angle, so it is bound to catch a lot of stray light. Fast wide-angle lenses often exhibit heavy vignetting. Olympus 12mm Vs Samyang 12mm Video Test from Pier-Yves Menkhoff on Vimeo.. Pier Yves sent us the following Olympus 12mm F/2.0 Vs. Rokinon 12mm F/2.0 comparison: Before everything, I would like to thank Hervé Danes for the loan of the Olympus 12mm F/2.0 lens. gear1box • … In fact, the Sigma profile actually appears to overcompensate at f/1.4. These four lenses, being from three different manufacturers, will share some attributes while differing in others. 7 years ago. Since we had both the Sigma and Sony in for testing at the same time, we decided to put them head-to-head to find out just what the differences are between them! Looking at my samples with the profile applied, I didn’t find distortion to be an issue with either lens. To be fair, the vignetting falls off pretty gradually at f/5.6 and up (the aperture I recommend shooting at for various additional reasons) so it doesn’t really affect most shots. Optically speaking, the Rokinon 16mm F/2 is excellent, but only in a narrow range, like F/4-5.6, stopping down to F/8 or smaller results in serious diffraction, and makes the image look soft. amzn_assoc_ad_type = "smart"; If size and weight are important to you, one of the first differences you’ll certainly notice is just how much smaller and lighter the Sony lens is in comparison to the Sigma. Its manufacturers took many steps necessary to cut costs, though they still managed to pack in a decent optical formula that I still shoot with to this day. Samyang/Rokinon 12mm F2.0 or Sigma 16mm F1.4 ? ( Log Out / For low-light work and shallow depth-of-field shots you won’t need to worry about the low corner sharpness, thankfully. The only physical control you’ll find on the barrels of the two lenses is a ridged fly-by-wire focus ring, which we’ll discuss in more detail in the autofocus/manual focus section below. Before we get to the direct comparisons, however, there are two things we wanted to direct your attention to as you may have missed it while … By f/2.8 it reduces to about a half pixel wide, and by f/4 it is completely gone. *There is also a third 16mm prime for the E-mount, the Samyang Rokinon 16mm f/2 manual focus lens. This effect is most noticeable at wide apertures, but can still be seen at the pixel level at f/5.6. Close-Focus: Marked at .66 feet/.2 meters, though the focus ring turns a tad past that. The focus ring is rubber, like the older version, but doesn’t have the grippy ridges of the old … At the moment I have an A6000 with the kit lens (16-50). (I do try and … Note that the building looks enlarged and skewed in the corner shot due to perspective distortion, common in all wide-angles. I have a choice between the two lenses. With all this put together, how does this lens stand up to my four pillars of shootability? Ive also got a link to full-resolution APS-C frame shot of … Light weight? By f/5.6 the lateral aberrations are not as noticeable. The 16mm f/2.0 ED AS UMC CS Lens from Rokinon is a manual focus wide-angle lens compatible with APS-C format DSLR digital cameras. Much to the delight of nightscape and astrophotographers everywhere we have a great selection of new and fast wide-angle lenses to pick from. Now that the Sigma 16mm f/1.4 has arrived on the scene, Sony users finally have a high quality 24mm equivalent prime they can rely on. I recommend always leaving the lens hood on to help prevent as much unwanted reflection as possible. I have a nikon D300 with cropped sensor at the moment and am quite happy with it! But at this price point? The Rokinon 16mm is an SLR lens, after all, and with its fast aperture, I knew it would be a relatively large optic to put in front of my a6500 and NEX-7. Find out which is better and their overall performance in the camera lens ranking. The focus ring is rubber, like the older version, but doesn’t have the grippy ridges of the old version. Nice! Rokinon 8mm vs. 10mm vs. Sigma 8-16mm vs. Pentax 10-17mm Ultra-wide Showdown Distortions. As a wide-angle lens on an APS-c camera, to expect noticeable subject separation at any focus distance will only set someone up to be disappointed. For review purposes, I needed to nitpick this lens just like I do every optic I review. 77 mm vs 83 mm: 6 mm smaller in diameter: Filter Thread: 62 mm vs 77 mm: Smaller filters are cheaper: Reasons to choose Rokinon 24mm f1.4 Aspherical over Sigma 30mm F1.4 EX DC HSM. Usually your post-production software will automatically apply the appropriate profile but it is always worth double checking, just in case it fails to do so. I … amzn_assoc_marketplace = "amazon"; Although the Sigma is visibly larger, it is also worth pointing out that it is very lightweight for this … Lightroom’s built-in lens profile corrects this distortion quite nicely, however, so I recommend always turning it on for this reason alone. Now that this budget wide-angle has run through the gauntlet, let’s see how it stacks up as a whole! Jun 19, 2016 Rokinon 8mm vs. 10mm vs. Sigma 8-16mm vs. Pentax 10-17mm Ultra-wide Showdown Introduction. Thankfully, the lens puts on a decent show for its price. The included lens profile for the Rokinon 16mm improves vignetting slightly, but with straight manual corrections you’ll need to fiddle with the adjustment sliders a lot. Instead, they just look slightly soft compared to what would be a sharp focus point! This issue most noticeably manifests itself in panoramas, discussed further on in the review. … amzn_assoc_placement = "adunit0"; The Sigma lenses are superb. The four lenses in this review all come with essentially the same components within their branded containers: Lens; Front Lens Cap; Rear Lens Cap; Lens Case; Various Paperwork/Booklets; Lens Serial/Proof of Ownership Card; Lens Specific Instruction Manual; Warranty Card/Information; With all … amzn_assoc_linkid = "0d1830809aceb8a8dccff6e1a38a13db"; Archived. thanks! Happily, the autofocus of both lenses are very smooth and quiet for both stills and video shooting. Below you can find a series of comparison shots taken at a long focus distance close to infinity. BUY from B&H PHOTO. Sigma 10mm F2.8 EX DC HSM Fisheye vs Sigma 15mm F2.8 EX DG Diagonal Fisheye. Miscellaneous: 8-bladed aperture stopping down to f/22, 77mm filter size, petal-shaped plastic lens hood, manual focus only, 80 degrees of focus rotation, metal mount, pinch-style lens cap, electronic contacts (F-mount version) for EXIF/focus confirmation. Some more obvious than others. With the lens hood mounted, subjects are practically touching the lens at close-focus distance. This is due to the Sigma having more focus breathing when focusing at the shortest distance. I find myself using 16mm wide angle most of the time. In fact, at f/11, the results are almost indistinguishable. 4 comments. ©2018 Alan Dyer. So, about three years ago I scrounged around for a deal on a used Rokinon 16mm f/2. The story would be different if this were a 16mm f/1, but that is neither here or there. It provides a 79.5° angle of view which translates into a 35mm format equivalency of 25.6mm. Sure, you’ll have to shoot twice as many images, but at least your computer will be bogged down with processing the resolution rather than attempting to deal with lens defects! The XP 50mm F1.2 lens for Canon EF Mount has officially arrived. Coming in at a hefty 405 grams, I’d say it’s not a light lens but does it make up for that in terms of quality? As I gradually grew out of my telephoto lens bubble I was so happy to stay in for a few years, it came time to look around for a decent wide-angle lens for travel photography, wide street shots, and one-shot landscapes (constantly having to stitch together shots with my 32mm Touit anytime I wanted a wide shot got tedious fast). Yet again, fast wide-angles tend to suffer from at least some distortion. Also regarding the weight, it’s no slouch either. I did initially wonder whether my Sony 16mm sample had a problem but others reviews of the lens have also confirmed that the performance at f/2.8 is disappointing. To get a better idea of the reflections in motion, check out this quick test at f/8 with the lens hood on: I would prefer the lens produce less reflections (especially the ones that are multi-colored), but at this lens’ price point, the Rokinon does an okay job. Click below for full-size crop embedded in the image. However, I simply have not had an opportunity to own these lenses for long enough to “abuse” them. ( Log Out / Price: Currently runs around $320 on most photography sites, three years ago I bought mine used for only $270. Focal Length - Wide: 30mm vs 35mm: 5mm wider coverage: Diaphragm Blades: 8 vs: better Bokeh: Autofocus: Yes vs None: Easier and more accurate focusing : Weight: 430 g vs 660 g: 230 g lighter: Length: 59 mm vs 112 mm: 53 mm shorter: Filter Thread: 62 mm vs 77 mm: Smaller … Even at this aperture and focal length, there is still a fair bit of subject separation from the background. Brendan Mitchell-July 13, 2018. When a subject is within the plane of focus, however, this humble prime produces sharp results. First, we'll revisit the … Second one is that if i went with Rokinon lenses Should i save money and go with old CV series 24 and 35 mm lenses OR the new … If you can afford it, the sigma is the better lens. It seems mechanically sound, and smaller / more simple in design compared to some of the others, so there might be a chance that it survives a little longer. Regarding basic sharpness performance, though, shoot at f/5.6 to guarantee decent sharpness, and if you want to shoot wide open, make sure those corners are out of the plane of focus! Definitely not. Starting wide open, there’s a good amount of center detail that is robbed by a bit of veiling haze–the lens doesn’t precisely line up all the wavelengths at this aperture, so there’s a “gray area” of in-focus that isn’t quite there. Sigma 35mm f/1.4 DG HSM ART Lens @ f/8. When it comes to sheer resolving power, the bigger and pricier Rokinon 14mm f/2.4 SP (aka, the Rokinon 14mm f/2.4 SP) is a champion. 63 mm vs 77 mm: 14 mm smaller in diameter: Reasons to choose Sigma 35mm F1.4 DG HSM over Rokinon 35mm f1.4. Although it was APS-c only, 16mm is still decently wide and f/2 is a nice aperture for low-light handheld shots. Thankfully Rokinon corrects these pretty well. Tumblr. Yet, with the … i want to do night-caps that include foreground and the Milky way. Note: the code above is invalidwhen the software is on pre-order. The Rokinon 16mm doesn’t provide a very consistent performance as the focus distance changes. The Sony features a lightweight aluminium alloy finish. Enter your email and click the blue button below to open the subscription form. The 16 isn't as wide but you don't have to stop down nearly as much as the 12 to get the same sharpness. Even better, as you can see from the example above, there isn’t much in the way of a “cat-eye” effect as the highlights near the edges of the frame. Size and weight wise, we’ve found that either lens is a good match for Sony E-mount cameras, though we hardly need to point out that any camera paired with the Sony 16mm will result in a more discreet and portable combo. This thread is archived. From these lense the sony 10-18 and the rokinon 12 & sigma 16. In regards to field curvature, flare, vignetting, and distortion, you bet! And I don't mind the carry of … In regards to bokeh highlights, it is rare to run across them in photos with the exception of super-close focus. The Sigma 16mm f/1.4 and Sony 16mm f/2.8 have the same focal length which equates to a 24mm equivalent field of view in 35mm terms. For landscape astrophotography mainly - but would be nice to use it for traditional landscape as well as I am headed to Tuscany, Italy shortly. This is a great lens for ultra-wide angle shots of the Milky Way, starscapes and time-lapse animations. Image quality wise it's sharper, and has better contrast, micro-contrast, and truer color rendering than Samyag's 85. Relatively light weight for its size with a decent build quality, Pretty smooth operation all around, though over time the focus ring may develop slack, Great sharpness in the center at all apertures, corners sharpen well by mid apertures, Very close focusing for a wide-angle lens, Bokeh and out-of-focus highlights are smooth and non-distracting in general, Longitudinal chromatic aberrations are well controlled even wide-open, Some mounts like the F-mount version include electronic contacts for EXIF data/auto aperture, SLR design makes the lens larger than it needs to be on a mirrorless camera, Plastic construction may eventually lead to more mechanical failures than an all-metal lens, Lens hood easily unlocks (usually while in camera bag), Noticeable field curvature and lack of sharpness in corners until f/5.6, Inconsistent sharpness performance at different focus distances, Susceptible to multiple small flare reflections, Vignetting never goes away and is difficult to correct even with a lens profile, Multi-row panoramas are a nightmare with this lens, Fully manual lens aside from EXIF data/auto aperture for certain camera mounts. If that weren’t enough, the Sigma 16mm digitally corrects optical distortion utilising in-camera digital correction, further improving the optical quality. In spite of its plastic construction, the lens has survived hell and high water both in and out of my camera bag. With the Sony, you always have to give the ring a half-turn to travel from infinity to the minimum focus distance. At wide apertures, like F/2-2.8, the image is also soft, even in the centers, which I didn't expect. Might be an important difference on a canon rebel. The Rokinon 16mm f/2, which I personally reviewed, was another lens that came out in 2013 and in my opinion it was built decently well.
Themed Food Days Of The Week, List Of Evergreen Ferns, Audio Technica Bluetooth Mod, Khazana Online Shopping, Simpsons Dentist Liar, Abs Academy Web Based Training, John Deere Mighty Trike, Virtual Clinical Excursions Book, Whitehouse, Tx Homes For Sale,